[anti-abuse-wg] Maintenance nightmares

Hi all,
I've just subscribed to this list, after I found no web form to report 
an invalid abuse-mailbox in whois data.

As an example, let me mention that the welcome message I received has 
a "List-Archive" header field with a value of 
<http://www.ripe.net/mailman/private/anti-abuse-wg/>.  The 
corresponding web page's title is "RIPE Mailing Lists", and searching 
for the keyword "abuse" leads no results.  Perhaps, that header 
field's value should have been 
<http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/anti-abuse-wg/>.

So what?  Entropy damages invisible data more steadily.

I like Tobias proposals, but wonder if they wouldn't be more incisive 
by concentrating on specific details, such as the abuse-mailboxes. 
Suppose we had a "ping" abuse-report-type to be sent to such addresses 
every few weeks, just to collect "on my guard!" replies.  Domains 
caught off guard deserve removal from whitelists...

How about abuse-mailboxes related to inetnums?  ARIN's web form 
doesn't apparently allow to report that, since it needs a domain name.

Ciao
Ale