[anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal: Frequent Update Reminder

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:57:11AM +0200, Tobias Knecht wrote:
> How about keeping the proposal as it is and just change from updating
> _all_ objects to just update the direct from RIPE allocated inet(6)num
> autnums.

This makes more sense to me.  We have about 7 allocated inet(6)num
objects (and their contacts are OK), and about 500+ assigned inet(6)num
objects - most of which are ok, but sometimes customer mail addresses
change and we're not told, so some of them will always be broken.

Our customer support people know how to reach the customer, so if an abuse
complaint hits our support desk, we *will* contact the customers (and if
we're told that the inetnum: data is wrong, we'll fix that, of course) -
so I think we're in pretty good shape, and having to click 500x "yes, ok"
once a year is overdoing things a bit...

Gert Doering
        -- LIR contact for de.space
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101001/3f737590/attachment.sig>