This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] OECD report on SPAM
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] OECD report on SPAM
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-10 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Wed Nov 24 10:18:52 CET 2010
On 22/Nov/10 14:33, julien tayon wrote: > Am I the only one uneasy with «cyber» crime ? A crime is a crime > whatever the media is used. While that's true, media or territory may determine the jurisdiction. > So RIPE & al are in a pretty uncomfortable position I guess, because > it is not their job to substitute themselves to the governments, while > being held responsible for the good state of internet legal > cooperation mechanisms. IMHO, when there will be enough NGOs to deal with every relevant aspect of life, we'll be finally able to dismiss governments altogether. Nowadays, it has been extensively demonstrated how deceptive advertisement, cheats, and profit-driven decision making can fool away traditional implementations of "democracy". Perhaps, the role of the Internet in the history of mankind is exactly to overcome those issues (including the ones I haven't quoted from your previous message).
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] OECD report on SPAM
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-10 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]