This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih at richih.org
Fri Nov 12 14:15:56 CET 2010
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 13:47, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: > http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-10.html Makes sense to me. As an aside, could the RIPE provide an additional diff view of those proposals? Hunting for changes and making sure you didn't miss a potentially crucial word is not that much fun and I suspect most of us end up pasting the text into vimdiff or similar, anyway. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]