[anti-abuse-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)

On 12 November 2010 12:47, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote:
> You can find the full proposal at:
>
>    http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-10.html
>
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> before 10 December 2010.

Initial thoughts...

So what happens to 'orphaned' resources? Are RIPE NCC the 'sponsoring'
LIR in this circumstance?
Does the NCC have the resources to deal with the increased level of
avuse complaints that may be targeted at them with this change?
Who would be responsible for maintaining the relationship, the
sponsoring LIR or the End user? Does this have an implication for mnt
objects?

I can see the logic but I think that this has the potential to cause
more problems than it solves

J
-- 

James Blessing
07989 039 476