[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)

On 11/11/10 10:21, Frank Gadegast wrote:
>
>> But making things mandatory doesn't solve poor design.
>
>
> ??? please explain, dont get it.
>


You are unable to find the (abuse) contact because you don't know where 
to look, not that it isn't there because it wasn't mandatory.


> We also get a lot of feedback from end users, that they fixed
> the security hole of their housing server, after we informed them.
>
This is great.

> We detect network sniffing BEFORE it actually steals passwords, by
> monitoring the MAC-addresses in our network.
>

But you are talking about your own customers. You will always have their 
contact information.


> DDoS attacks happen every day, get detected and blocked.
Exactly. Just like spam.



> There is no need for an email address of the admin-c.
>
I disagree, but it's optional and thats great.