This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu Nov 11 11:12:36 CET 2010
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:00:54AM +0100, Frank Gadegast wrote: Hi > Its not interesting, if the abuse contact really receives or even reads > an email, more interesting is, that he supplies everybody with an > abuse address he "wants" to have email too and that it exists. > First: abuse reports will not go to contacts, that have nothing to > with abuse handling anymore > Second: the owner cannot say, that he did not know about the problems > he caused, because he received the mail via his own mail > servers. Its not the problem of the sender, if he decides to What brings you to that conclusion? Is there any policy which prohibit using somebody else's mail servers? ;-) Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]