This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Nov 10 13:51:45 CET 2010
>> And how anybody could stop publishing this kind of info in remark >> fields? > > Unfortunately you can't. But if everybody knows that the mandatory IRT > is the place to publish abuse contact information, nobody will look for > remark fields any further. And if you have to have an IRT, why publish a > remark field with the same information? No they don't, at least not in the next decade. It might slowly move, but it by no means will be a flag day. Tools exit and people will keep using them even when they know there is something better. I come from the IPv6 lobby, trust me I know :( Groet, MarcoH (oh and still only here as a concerned citizen, no hats)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]