[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)

Hi,

>>> And how anybody could stop publishing this kind of info in remark
>>> fields?
>>
>> Unfortunately you can't. But if everybody knows that the mandatory IRT
> 
> Everybody? Stop joking. :) Every single regular not-technical user who
> heard about whois on facebook forum?

Sorry. That was to broadly. ;-)
Everybody meant, every RIPE member and everybody who wants to use abuse
contact information for serious reporting or work.

>> is the place to publish abuse contact information, nobody will look for
>> remark fields any further. And if you have to have an IRT, why publish a
>> remark field with the same information?
> 
> Since we are not going to delete that, there is huge change to have a
> lot of such remarks fields.

If there are ways to delete remark fields containing abuse@ addresses,
we can do that, but I guess we will not catch stuff like

remark: Please send complaints about spam to
remark: abuse at domain.tld

in an appropriate way.


Thanks,

Tobias

abusix.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101110/d90a4b8a/attachment.sig>