This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Wed Nov 10 12:18:32 CET 2010
2010/11/10 Tobias Knecht <tk at abusix.com>: > Some ISPs in Europe are already using this as a greylisting reason. Greylisting != blocking all traffic to and from. Using the existence of irt objects as a soft indicator for soft decisions is a neat concept. Flooding the db with irt objects might hurt this, in a way. Introducing formal levels for irt objects would keep the old system intact. Quick, informal poll: Who thinks an irt level concept would be useful? Am I overlooking any procedural, policy or technical limitations? Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]