[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)

Am 10.11.2010 12:01, schrieb Sander Steffann:
>> Creating a 'single point' makes it implicit that others should
>> disappear and you might throw away a load of data and you don't
>> know what you will get back for it.
> 
> I wasn't thinking about throwing away any data. A single point
> containing at least the same amount of information that we have now
> would be very nice though. The difficult part is how to migrate all
> that information to that single point...

Full Ack.

A mandatory place will help with the migration process. Asking members
to create IRT Objects over a period of 2 years should migrate a huge
amount. Contacting the members without a valid IRT link every 6 or 12
month will help as well.

Thanks,

Tobias

abusix.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101110/90ffce9e/attachment.sig>