[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)

Um ok, but what has that got to do with greylisting???


Mr. Michele Neylon
Blacknight
http://Blacknight.tel

Via iPhone so excuse typos and brevity

On 10 Nov 2010, at 11:06, "Tobias Knecht" <tk at abusix.com> wrote:

>>> Some ISPs in Europe are already using this as a greylisting reason.
>> 
>> I assume you're referring to email?
> 
> Right.
> 
>> If so, why is that a problem?
> 
> If you want to judge on the existence of the IRT if somebody is doing
> abuse handling or not you should not make the IRT mandatory. That was
> Leo Vegoda saying.
> 
> As soon as people will decide to do so and add the existence of an IRT
> to their reputation metrics, there is pressure and pushed by this
> pressure people will create IRT Objects, but not with the intent to do a
> good abuse job, but with the intent of deliverability.
> 
> So imo this is no reason to make the IRT not mandatory.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tobias
> 
> abusix.org
>