This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Nov 10 11:57:31 CET 2010
On 10 nov 2010, at 11:30, Sander Steffann wrote: >> That being said, I still think a single canonical place to store abuse >> handling information is A Very Good Thing. > > +1 Be careful of what you wish for, maybe somebody can produce the same stats as I did back in 2004: - number of inet(6)num covered by IRT - number of inet(6)num covered by abuse-mailbox attributes - Number of inet(6)num containing a remarks field with the words 'complaint' or 'abuse' in it Creating a 'single point' makes it implicit that others should disappear and you might throw away a load of data and you don't know what you will get back for it. Groet, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]