This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tobias Knecht
tk at abusix.com
Wed Nov 10 11:22:40 CET 2010
Am 10.11.2010 10:24, schrieb Richard Hartmann: > 2010/11/10 Tobias Knecht <tk at abusix.com>: > >> The next step that will happen, or is already happening is that ISPs are >> using the reputation data you are talking about to block, for example >> email, which is a pretty good idea in my opinion. "As long as you do not >> offer a address where I can complain about your traffic I do not want >> your traffic." > > I don't see this happening; ever. Large impact triggered by a way too > low metric. Some ISPs in Europe are already using this as a greylisting reason. > That being said, I still think a single canonical place to store abuse > handling information is A Very Good Thing. And that is one of my main intentions with this proposal. Thanks, Tobias -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101110/c2f456fe/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]