This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Re: 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kostas Zorbadelos
kzorba at otenet.gr
Tue Nov 9 09:10:08 CET 2010
On Monday 08 November 2010 22:35:38 Tobias Knecht wrote: Tobias, as a person who does not know very much about the internal workings of the RIPE-DB and all the policies involved, I find your proposal a very good step towards a correct direction. We should at least agree, I believe, that all IP operators should provide an abuse contact for the address ranges they are "responsible" for. And this has to happen in a clear, consistent way. I can't imagine any reasons of why this would create any problems we cannot overcome for the "greater good". Of course, I am all ears for any arguments against :) Nice to see some work affecting policies coming out of the anti-abuse WG. Regards, Kostas Zorbadelos
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]