This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Mon May 3 15:21:44 CEST 2010
(Wearing my private citizen head) > 4.3 Delete abuse-mailbox fields in all objects that do not define an IRT, and delete > the trouble field everywhere in 2011. This is a really bad idea, there is no guarantee those objects will allready be updated to link to an IRT object, nor is there a guarantee those objects will ever be updated to start linking to IRT. So you end up throwing away perfectly good data and end up with even more difficulties to find contact details. Marco
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]