This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Sat Jul 24 18:06:06 CEST 2010
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 04:32:05PM +0200, Tobias Knecht wrote: Hi > I would suggest the following. [cut] > The next step is a policy proposal that does the following things: > > - Introduce the IRT Object into ASN Objects. > - Make the abuse-mailbox attribute mandatory for the IRT Objects. > - Make IRT Objects mandatory for directly by RIPE delegated Ranges. So why are you not going to propose that under PDP? Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]