This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Emanuele Balla
balla at spin.it
Fri Jul 23 16:57:21 CEST 2010
On 7/23/10 4:32 PM, Tobias Knecht wrote: > Hello together, > > why are we moving the problem of non existing abuse contact away from > open access to bulk access. > > I would suggest the following. [...] > Creating an IRT Object with an abuse-mailbox attribute. > - Introduce the IRT Object into ASN Objects. > - Make the abuse-mailbox attribute mandatory for the IRT Objects. > - Make IRT Objects mandatory for directly by RIPE delegated Ranges. > > IMHO this will solve all the problems. "All the problems" is maybe too optimistic, but at least we have something to start with. +1 I also like Richard's idea of xxxxxxxxx at abuse.ripe.net contact addresses: this will solve (part of) the problem of email-address exposure AND allow abuse address reachability monitoring. -- # Emanuele Balla # # # System & Network Engineer # Cell: +39 348 7747907 # # Spin s.r.l. - AS6734 # Phone: +39 040 9869090 # # Trieste # Email: balla at staff.spin.it #
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]