[anti-abuse-wg] Economic incentives for more cooperation in fighting spam (new article on RIPE Labs)

Peter

On 06/07/2010 22:17, peter h wrote:
> RIPE could start with reorganizing it's lame anti-abuse group to a more specific anti-spam
> working group and start propagating already known facts to it's "customers". 

It looks like you are confusing the RIPE NCC with the RIPE Community.

If you want to reorganise the WG then you should put proposals to the
community, not rant at a post fron an NCC staffer about work being done
in the NCC labs.

If you have formal proposals about the way forward for the Anti-Abuse WG
then the community and the WG Chairs would like to hear them so that
they can be developed and progressed.

Remember the RIPE NCC !== The RIPE Community

	f