This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] How to Ask For A Website to Be taken Down, was How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Previous message (by thread): Fwd: [anti-abuse-wg] How to Ask For A Website to Be taken Down, was How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How to Ask For A Website to Be taken Down, was How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
J.D. Falk
jdfalk-lists at cybernothing.org
Mon Dec 27 20:38:52 CET 2010
On Dec 23, 2010, at 3:38 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: > Does it make any sense to produce a RIPE document suggesting the proper > way to report abuse? > > This document can be short & sweet, just like the reports should be. A > few good ideas are already in this thread: report to the right people, > say the important bits up-front, and so on. Similar documents were written in years past, but something up to date would be very welcome. On Dec 23, 2010, at 7:30 AM, Tobias Knecht wrote: > We are already working on a format, that is used by more and more > people. It is meant as an extension to the well known RFC 5965 ARF. > Called X-ARF. http://xarf.org When will your proposed extension be brought to the IETF, so it can be made an official standard?
- Previous message (by thread): Fwd: [anti-abuse-wg] How to Ask For A Website to Be taken Down, was How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How to Ask For A Website to Be taken Down, was How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]