This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Re: Additional Layers for Economic Incentives to improve Internet Security
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Additional Layers for Economic Incentives to improve Internet Security
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Additional Layers for Economic Incentives to improve Internet Security
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
peter håkanson
peter at hk.ipsec.se
Mon Dec 27 17:01:38 CET 2010
On Dec 27, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Jørgen Hovland wrote: > Hi, > > On 26/12/2010 21:49, John S. Quarterman wrote: <snip> >> >> >> > > Organizations that doesn't use mail at all will emit very little spam. Wrong. Organizations that don't use mail might still be spam-emitters if their security is bad. In fact organizations that don't understand security is likley to be victims of spambots. > > > Cheers, > >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Additional Layers for Economic Incentives to improve Internet Security
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Additional Layers for Economic Incentives to improve Internet Security
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]