This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
frank at powerweb.de
Mon Apr 12 13:24:42 CEST 2010
James Davis wrote: Hello, > Frank Gadegast wrote: > >> Why that ? >> >> A abuse complain is a abuse complain and belongs to this discussion. >> The question is, how the member has to handle it. >> >> Give me details and ideas instead of "washing" it away ... > > In the four years I've been sitting behind our rather busy abuse mailbox > we've had questions like: > > "Your customer published something I don't agree with. Take their > website down now!" > > "Someone broke into my office, please could you send the security staff > around sometime today". > > "My ex boyfriend is really annoying me, please tell him to stop > e-mailing me". > > "I was playing CS2 with a ping time of 15ms, now 14ms, helpz!" > > "My internet activity is being traced by the Illuminati using your > network, please help me. There's an albino monk at my door!" > > None of these are cases of *network* abuse, even though the often end up > in an abuse mailbox, and so outside the scope of the address. You see, they are already bothering you. So lets create a system thats better. A standard report format could be better. The RIPE system could generate that by supplying an easy form with explanations and FAQs. The RIPE system could hide your abuse address from this stuff. There will be no need for any abuse contact in RIPE objects anymore. Lets drop my idea with the general IP-adress-like email address and let the system under http://abuse.ripe.net present a form instead, thats capable of analysing reports much better and filter the most stupid things out. And filter spam reports out, that dont belong to you ... And think about how valuable this system will be for all those, that do not have a good abuse team so far. I bet a lot of members are not publishing their abuse address, because they dont want to be enoyed with these cases you described and they will be happy to use this system instead. Kind regards, Frank > > HTH, > > James > > - -- > James Davis +44 1235 822 229 PGP: 0xD1622876 > JANET CSIRT 0870 850 2340 (+44 1235 822 340) > Lumen House, Library Avenue, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0SG > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iD8DBQFLwvxShZi14NFiKHYRAkP4AJ9iNwv0HPag51osszhHLG47JNt3UgCdFqCe > 4FE92KCYM8cBItNF68s5yAU= > =iRwI > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > JANET(UK) is a trading name of The JNT Association, a company limited > by guarantee which is registered in England under No. 2881024 > and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue, > Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG > > > -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen, -- PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 ====================================================================== Public PGP Key available for frank at powerweb.de
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]