This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Next message (by thread): SV: [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey Race
jrace at attglobal.net
Sun Apr 11 18:25:36 CEST 2010
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:01:16 +0000, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote: >And a witch hunt is better? "witch-hunt also witch hunt N. An investigation carried out ostensibly to uncover subversive activities but actually used to harass and undermine those with differing views." The measures proposed in the RFC I am drafting do not relate to the content of the message traffic. The objective measures are clearly specified. Read the proposal please. It has nil to do with politics or dissenting views. Note that many network operators already enforce such rules. The issue is just to universalize this best practice.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Next message (by thread): SV: [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]