This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey Race
jrace at attglobal.net
Sun Apr 11 17:52:51 CEST 2010
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:50:49 +0200, Jørgen Hovland wrote: > It is of course more timeconsuming, but legal systems >(should) give everyone a fair chance. Legal systems have failed in this task and will continue to fail for the reasons described in the article. It is magical thinking to believe that legal systems can help. >Legal systems also pursue the party that is legally doing something >wrong, not the ISP or any other third party that shouldn't be bothered >in the first place (of course sometimes it is the ISP etc). The analogy is incorrect. Airlines are the ones who keep drunk pilots out of cockpits, not legal systems. You hold the entity responsible for its behavior. To continue to comparison, an airline could tell one of his pilots he is to stop flying due to misconduct. It might separately be a crime which the state authorities might pursue or not. But the adverse impact should be prevented as a separate action
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]