This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey Race
jrace at attglobal.net
Sat Apr 10 14:32:28 CEST 2010
Legal systems are ineffective in dealing with this type of issue for well understood structural reasons. See <http://www.camblab.com/misc/univ_std.txt> based on <http://www.camblab.com/nugget/spam_03.pdf> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:17:40 +0200, Jørgen Hovland wrote:>Hello, >>On 09/04/2010 21:43, Frank Gadegast wrote: >>>> to do something against abuse that is coming from their networks. >>>What is abuse, and why do you think you are a better judge than the >government?> >> Working against them will need some kind of "punishment", and sure there >> is more to talk about first with this. But at least there will be >> some kind of identification, wich one needs to be educated >> or even "punished" with this kind of system. >> The consequences are still for further discussion. >>>But this already exists (the law).
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]