[anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an abuse monitor system

Frank ,

How do you propose to do this Ip to mail Address translation ?

BR
Balaji

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Frank Gadegast <phade at www.powerweb.de>wrote:

> >
> > >
> > > Not getting it.
> >
> > I apologise. Allow me to rephrase:
> >
> > Any organisation to which net space is allocated or assigned may own
> zero, one or several Internet domains. It may be difficult to know exactly
> what to type on the domain side of an abuse@ address. Your proposal avoids
> this issue. This is an advantage of your proposal as compared with RFC 2142.
>
> No, because the system generates email addresses only related to the IP
> address
> that causes the abuse.
>
> The monitoring system at RIPE NCC than "translates" this IP like email
> addresses
> to either the abuse address, that the member was putting into RIPEs system
> or the main member address, the member has to setup, when becoming a
> member.
>
> RIPE NCC knows best how to "translate" the IP like abuse email address
> to the members address, because RIPE NCC has best knowlegde about
> the allocation all member ownes.
>
> BTW: thats the main advantage of my draft ... nobody has to know
> the actual abuse address for a IP range or has to look it up
> via whois. Anybody that gets attacked knows the right address
> just by sending his report to
>
> 1.2.3.4 at abuse.ripe.net
>
> when the IP 1.2.3.4 caused the abuse.
>
>
> Kind regards, Frank
>
> >
> > --
> > Thor Kottelin
> > http://www.anta.net/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20100409/30a5d348/attachment.html>