[anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 07:26:20PM +0200, furio ercolessi wrote:
> > Sure, once we agree on a definition for spam, that COULD work fine.
> 
> Is there a disagreement on this point ? I thought it was 
> "unsolicited+bulk"  (as in http://www.spamhaus.org/definition.html )
> and that this definition was quite universally accepted in the industry.

JFTR, I don't think it has to be "bulk" to be SPAM.  OTOH, I see the
"C" in "UCE" as relevant... if someone sends a commercial sales mail 
to my private e-mail, and it's just a single and directly targeted
e-mail, it's *still* SPAM.

So, you see, there is no universal definition.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  150584

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279