This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
furio ercolessi
furio+as at spin.it
Tue Apr 6 19:26:20 CEST 2010
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:52:43PM +0200, Jogi Hofm?ller wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 04:45:18PM +0100, Brian Nisbet wrote: > > >>>> How can not anybody have an idea, how to solve the problem ? > >>> > >>> Many people have many ideas, not all of them work. There remains no > >>> silver bullet. And any recommendation made still needs to be adopted. > >> > >> I just discribed one arround launch time. > >> RIPE should urged all members to stop spam originating from their networks. > > Sure, once we agree on a definition for spam, that COULD work fine. Is there a disagreement on this point ? I thought it was "unsolicited+bulk" (as in http://www.spamhaus.org/definition.html ) and that this definition was quite universally accepted in the industry. furio
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]