This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Re: update on netsecdb project
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: update on netsecdb project
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
peter h
peter at hk.ipsec.se
Tue Apr 6 17:26:20 CEST 2010
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 15.10, Dr. Alexander K. Seewald wrote: > IMHO just having blacklists based on IP addresses is not enough: > * rapidly increasing mobile internet (which has dynamic IPs unless > one keeps a connection open indefinitely - hardly ever the case) > * tendency to reuse one bot for an ever decreasing number of spam messages > - so blacklist are and always getting to be less helpful. spamblocklists works often on whole ranges. MIne does ( i block the whole range assigned by ripe/apnic/arin for ISP's that allow spam to flow out of their nets) But i agree; blocking single ip's does not help. > <snip> > So here's to hoping the spammers die out from the current crisis and > we can switch off all our spamfilters... I wouldn't bet on this. As long as law-enforcement does not hunt spammers we will continue to have the spamproblem. What if spam would be characterized as terrorism, then maybe ISP had to act ... > > Best, > Alex -- Peter Håkanson There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it again ... and again ... and again ... and again. ( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: update on netsecdb project
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]