[anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project

> 
> Frank

Hi,

> On 6 Apr 2010, at 09:14, Frank Gadegast wrote:
> 
> > I even mentioned that the RIPE community should develop mechanisms to
> > punish members that do not react to abuse reports delivered to their
> > abuse addresses, and thats defny work for this group to define these
> > mechanisms.
> 
> Policy comes from the community - we have a formal process to develop  
> policy that is available at:
> 
> 	http://www.ripe.net/docs/pdp.html

This group IS the community, so why is their no proposal so far ?
After 2 years ?
I would love to work together with more expirienced members of the
mailling list, but as far as I see it: simply nothing happens ...

> Section 2.1 shows how to start creating a new RIPE policy and  
> highlights that anyone can start the process, it is a bottom up  
> development, not top down.
> 
> -=-=-
> 2.1 Creating a Proposal
> Discussions may be started by anyone at any time. Participants are  
> welcome to discuss broad ideas as well as to make detailed policy  
> proposals. Proposals are made using the Policy Proposal template,  
> attached as Appendix B.
> 
> -=-=-
> 
> The NCC will be available to help you with drafting the document.

The first step should be a mandatory abuse-field.

We could simply copy APNICs proposal:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-079


Kind regards, Frank
--
PHADE Software - PowerWeb                       http://www.powerweb.de
Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast             mailto:frank at powerweb.de
Schinkelstrasse 17                                fon: +49 33200 52920
14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany             fax: +49 33200 52921
======================================================================
Public PGP Key available for frank at powerweb.de
> 
> HTH
> 
> 	Fearghas
>