This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Antispam measures
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Antispam measures
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Whois database accuracy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey Race
jrace at attglobal.net
Wed Oct 21 14:54:58 CEST 2009
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:06:13 +0100, Brian Nisbet wrote: > However, registries are not the Internet police, this is an >important point to remember. Precisely; you cannot curb anti-social behavior without rapid and ultimately terminal penalties; this is the way of the world; the Internet will remain lawless and spam will continue to increase until the same lessons applied in every other domain of human activity are brought to be bear on the Internet, by e.g RIPE and ICANN. As you say, it's your choice. It's all in <http://www.camblab.com/misc/univ_std.txt> based on <http://www.camblab.com/nugget/spam_03.pdf>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Antispam measures
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Whois database accuracy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]