This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE 57: Anti Abuse WG Minutes
- Previous message (by thread): RES: [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE 57: Anti Abuse WG Minutes
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE 57: Anti Abuse WG Minutes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thor Kottelin
thor at anta.net
Wed May 6 14:52:19 CEST 2009
> > One issue that companies see is that > > users > > sign-up to newsletters or the like, then forget they have done so > > and hit > > the "report spam" button when something drops into their inbox. > > > > If such spam reports are made, then the sender's emails will be > > blocked > > by the service provider and legitimately requested email will not > > reach > > its destination, thereby affecting the relevant sender's > business. Apologies for this addition, but I would also like to note that this specific scenario is a non-issue. If a service provider blocks mail because of user requests or any other reason, it is within its right to do so. Mail server farms are private property; no sender can have a subjective right to reach anyone's inbox, whether or not said sender's profits would be affected by its bulk mail not being read. I guess the bottom line is that bulk mailing is such a tainted industry that anyone who sets up shop therein must assume that their mail will be blocked to heaven and back. -- Thor Kottelin http://www.anta.net/
- Previous message (by thread): RES: [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE 57: Anti Abuse WG Minutes
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE 57: Anti Abuse WG Minutes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]