This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] how to detect spambots - SPAMTrusted
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] how to detect spambots - SPAMTrusted
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] how to detect spambots - SPAMTrusted
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed Mar 4 17:52:30 CET 2009
Frank, On 04/03/2009 8:43, "Frank Gadegast" <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: [...] > No, a real abuse-field is a must and it MUST be read, and it must > be possible to proof, that somebody reacts. If you want to change the requirements for the RIPE database then you need to take it up in the Database WG: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/db/index.html Regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] how to detect spambots - SPAMTrusted
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] how to detect spambots - SPAMTrusted
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]