<html><body><div dir="ltr" style=""><div> </div><div style=""> <div dir="ltr">Dear members,</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">I agree with the post of R. Bakker @ <em style="box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: "Open Sans", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.300000190734863px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">Dec 8 00:49:28 CET 2021 under this mailing list.</em></div><div dir="ltr"><em style="box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: "Open Sans", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.300000190734863px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"><br></em></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">New members should not be pushed as hard as, say, a large company with multiple huge ranges with a lot of unused IPv4 space. Incentives should be placed on the use of much IPv4, the perfect way to regulate this is to ask a monthly or yearly fee per allocated IPv4 address. </span></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br></span></div><div dir="ltr">as a example, average large DC or hosting company seems to currently hold 20 to 50% of its IPv4 space unused and keeps reserving ipv4. You will retrieve a lot of ranges if all out of a sudden it costs them thousands of euro’s each period, because that is a huge write off for them and something they can generally not afford.</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"></div><div dir="ltr">That change would cause a lot of IPv4 to be free’d up, and make more room for startups and other business that actually have good reasoning for using that ipv4 space.</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Kind regards,</div><div dir="ltr">Diederik de Zee</div> </div> </div></body></html>