<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> </head> <body dir="auto"> How about if this wasn’t full allocation transfer ? You are making a query about the particular exact size of the block so it wouldn’t show? <div> </div> <div>Also, baffled that you have the guts to continue on this quest following an obviously false accusation that you started it with? <div dir="ltr"> <div>With Kind Regards, </div> Dominik Nowacki Clouvider Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: <a href="tel:08750969">08750969</a>. Registered office: <a href="">88 Wood Street, London, United Kingdom, EC2V 7RS</a>. Please note that Clouvider Limited may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security and staff training. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the intended recipient. If you do not believe you are the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify <a href="mailto:abuse@clouvider.net">abuse@clouvider.net</a> of this e-mail immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Clouvider Limited nor any of its employees therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. </div> <div dir="ltr"> <blockquote type="cite">On 9 Oct 2019, at 06:37, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote: </blockquote> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div dir="ltr">In message <CAFV686eC55sR4vd4iB_ykRmf9ddgm1=pOxsNGSVqji+fD08VtQ@mail.gmail.com>, Jacob Slater <jacob@rezero.org> wrote: <blockquote type="cite">According to </blockquote> <blockquote type="cite">https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-transfers-and-mergers/transfer-statistics/within-ripe-ncc-service-region/ipv4-transfer-statistics, </blockquote> <blockquote type="cite">this appears to have been a transfer, not a new allocation. </blockquote> I guess that I will have to speak to my friends in the DB working group about that, because there is *no* indication of this whatsoever in either the current -or- the historical records for the 62.222.0.0/15 block, specifically. The only historical record on file for this block is as follows: ======================================================================== % Version 1 (current version) of object "62.222.0.0 - 62.223.255.255" % This version was a UPDATE operation on 2019-08-20 13:55 inetnum: 62.222.0.0 - 62.223.255.255 netname: IE-COOLWAVE-20010321 country: IE org: ORG-CCL78-RIPE status: ALLOCATED PA mnt-by: mnt-ie-coolwave-1 mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT created: 2019-08-20T11:55:01Z last-modified: 2019-08-20T11:55:01Z source: RIPE </div> </blockquote> </div> </body> </html>