<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
Dear Colleagues,
<div>We are in support of this proposal.</div>
<div><br>
<div dir="ltr">
<div><font style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); font-size: 13pt;">With Kind Regards,</font><font style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); font-size: 13pt;"> </font></div>
<span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><font>Dominik Nowacki</font><font> </font><font><br>
</font><font> </font><font><br>
Clouvider Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: </font><a href="tel:08750969"><u>08750969</u></a><font>. Registered office: </font><a href=""><u>88 Wood Street, London, United Kingdom, EC2V 7RS</u></a><font>. </font></span><font><br>
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
On 24 Jan 2019, at 07:35, Martin Tonusoo <<a href="mailto:martin.tonusoo@citictel-cpc.com">martin.tonusoo@citictel-cpc.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000">
<div>Hello,</div>
<div><br data-mce-bogus="1">
</div>
<div>is there any feedback on this proposal? While it is more a clarification than an actual policy change, then it might clear some confusion to create assignments for LIR own infrastructure within their allocation.</div>
<div><br data-mce-bogus="1">
</div>
<div><br data-mce-bogus="1">
</div>
<div>
<div>Best regards,</div>
<div>Martin Tonusoo</div>
<div>IP Network Engineer</div>
<div>--------------------------</div>
<div> CITIC Telecom CPC</div>
<div> <a href="http://www.citictel-cpc.com">www.citictel-cpc.com</a></div>
<div>--------------------------</div>
<div>Direct: +372 622 3321</div>
<div>NOC 24/7: +372 622 3300</div>
<div>NOC 24/7: +7 495 9815670</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br data-mce-bogus="1">
</div>
<hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__">
<div data-marker="__HEADERS__"><b>From: </b>"Marco Schmidt" <<a href="mailto:mschmidt@ripe.net">mschmidt@ripe.net</a>><br>
<b>To: </b>"address-policy-wg" <<a href="mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net">address-policy-wg@ripe.net</a>><br>
<b>Sent: </b>Thursday, January 17, 2019 3:00:50 PM<br>
<b>Subject: </b>[address-policy-wg] 2019-01 New Policy Proposal (Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA")<br>
</div>
<br>
<div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__">Dear colleagues,<br>
<br>
A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for <br>
"ASSIGNED PA"" is now available for discussion.<br>
<br>
This proposal aims to make it clear in the IPv4 Policy that the status <br>
"ASSIGNED PA" can also be used for assignments to an LIR's infrastructure.<br>
<br>
You can find the full proposal at:<br>
<a href="https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01">https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01</a><br>
<br>
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this <br>
four week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide <br>
feedback to the proposer.<br>
<br>
At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of <br>
the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal.<br>
<br>
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <br>
<<a href="mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net">address-policy-wg@ripe.net</a>> before 15 February 2019.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Marco Schmidt<br>
Policy Officer<br>
RIPE NCC<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>