<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Just for the record: part of the WG Chair's job is to judge the "roughness"<br>
of consensus based on the amount of supporting and opposing voices - both<br>
the number, and the quality of arguments have to be weighted (and to some<br>
extent the person making a certain argument).<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm certainly not among the fans of Lu but seeing such a statement from the WG Chair is unbelieveble. Really ? Do you ever judge a statement based on who is making it and not objectively ?</div><div><br></div><div>In my opinion there is no space for any such extent and yes your job should be to represent an impartial and objective arbitration. Otherwise, I get the impression you are many times too subjective and try to enforce your personal opinions on others.</div><div><br></div><div>If you can not be impartial and objective it would be only honourable from you to step down, join us in the debates and let someone else do the job.</div><div><br></div><div>But as I've noticed (and nobody cared) you're one of the hoarders of last /8 so I really don't expect you to do that.<span></span></div><div><br></div><div>Ciprian</div>