<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style></style></head><body lang=EN-AU link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1>Hi,<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>I have IPv6 deployed in my network since 2009 (I’m not in Iran).<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>The problem of using a 6to4 service in Iran to provide service to end-users is that there would be no censorship or control by the government (LI = Lawful interception) and doing that is a crime in some countries.<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>Arash<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p><a name="_MailEndCompose"><o:p> </o:p></a><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>From: Sergey [mailto:gforgx@fotontel.ru] Sent: Monday, 13 June 2016 10:32 AM To: Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc@parsun.com>; 'Gert Doering' <gert@space.net> Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 deployment<o:p></o:p></div></div><o:p> </o:p>But you have already been pointed at using, e. g., HE's BGP-enabled tunnel service. What's the problem with using it and deploying IPv6 on your own network? <o:p></o:p><div>13 июня 2016 г. 3:27:05 GMT+03:00, Arash Naderpour <<a href="mailto:arash_mpc@parsun.com">arash_mpc@parsun.com</a>> пишет:<o:p></o:p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><pre>The point is that not all countries are the same when it comes to rules , some regulatory or government organizations may force ISPs in some area to stick with IPv4, as they simply don't have IPv6 ready LI platforms. I'm sure that there are some plans to deploy IPv6 in all countries soon or later it would be done (even Iran has a v6 road map), but telling others to go and deploy IPv6 (or it is not difficult to deploy) does not change the fact that there are more limitations out there. anyway, thanks for your thoughtful advises. Regards, Arash P.S even in Australia the biggest service provider (Telstra) is not providing IPv6 service to residential customers as of today, -----Original Message----- From: Gert Doering [<a href="mailto:gert@space.net">mailto:gert@space.net</a>] Sent: Monday, 13 June 2016 3:42 AM To: Arash Naderpour <<a href="mailto:arash_mpc@parsun.com">arash_mpc@parsun.com</a>> Cc:<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>'Alexander Koeppe' <<a href="mailto:Alexander.Koeppe@merckgroup.com">Alexander.Koeppe@merckgroup.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net">address-policy-wg@ripe.net</a> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** Re: IPv4 reserved space Hi, On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:39:59AM +1000, Arash Naderpour wrote:<o:p></o:p></pre><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #729FCF 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt'><pre> And I don't understand why some people think that everyone can deploy IPv6, it is simply not available everywhere. It is not about difficulty, it is about possibility. <o:p></o:p></pre></blockquote><pre> Work with your regulator to *make* it possible - like the rest of the world has. It might take a while, but "not doing anything and complaining that IPv4 has run out" is not the right approach. (You *should* have started to work with your regulator 10+ years ago, it's not like this is coming as a surprise) Gert Doering --<o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 <o:p></o:p></pre></blockquote></div> -- Простите за краткость, создано в K-9 Mail.<o:p></o:p></div></body></html>