<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Hi Nick,<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 22/05/2016 13:10, Nick Hilliard ha
scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:57419394.5060503@foobar.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Riccardo Gori wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">There are no good solutions to the problem at hand, only compromises.
If the current policy is changed to something else, the people who
benefit in the short term will be happier and the people who pay for
this generosity will be disappointed.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">IPv6
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
If ipv6 provided full backwards compatibility with ipv4, it would be a
solution.
Any organisation which is forced into providing ipv4 connectivity using
an ipv6 transition mechanism will operate at a competitive disadvantage
to an organisation which can provide native ipv4. This isn't a swipe at
ipv6: it's simply an observation that we have come to depend on features
of ipv4 which cannot be fully replicated using ipv6 transition mechanisms.
This is why I referred to migrating to ipv6 as a compromise. Long term,
it may be a good compromise and many years down the road, it may even be
better than ipv4. But as long as there are ipv4 addresses available, it
is condemned to being second best by the legacy of the existing
single-stacked ipv4 install base.
</pre>
</blockquote>
IPv6 is the solution provided to us by IETF to grow the internet.<br>
I saw many limitations of IPv4 were exceeded by technology solutions
p2p, nat etc.<br>
it can happen for IPv6 too, some breaking technology can speed up
the adoption<br>
and maybe new ideas can overcome use difficulties or limitations<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:57419394.5060503@foobar.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">every policy that makes IPv6 adoption a must can help slow down IPv4
allocation rate and in the meanwhile will even lower IPv4 maket value
[...]
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I don't believe there is any evidence to support either of these statements.</pre>
</blockquote>
I just saw very to low interest in IPv6 around policies and this
make me have a bad feeling, that's it.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:57419394.5060503@foobar.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Also, please bear in mind that if strong policies caused better adoption
of new protocols, we would be having this discussion using X.400.
Nick
</pre>
</blockquote>
regards<br>
Riccardo<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<pre>Ing. Riccardo Gori
e-mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rgori@wirem.net">rgori@wirem.net</a>
Mobile: +39 339 8925947
Mobile: +34 602 009 437
Profile: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943">https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943</a>
</pre>
<img src="cid:part1.CA99E959.2E236153@wirem.net" width="200">
<pre>WIREM Fiber Revolution
Net-IT s.r.l.
Via Cesare Montanari, 2
47521 Cesena (FC)
Tel +39 0547 1955485
Fax +39 0547 1950285
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re-
plying to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:info@wirem.net">info@wirem.net</a>
Thank you
WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
</pre>
</div>
</body>
</html>