<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body ><div>Only people who would object are those who wana exploit the system!</div><div><br></div><div>If i did this in 1995 > i would be loaded! </div><div><br></div><div>I still have my 'rose tinted glasses on' </div><div><br></div><div>Feeling old! </div><div><br></div><div>RIPE.. this needs to stop!</div><div><br></div>Danial Subhani<div>Pro-Net Internet Services Ltd</div><br><br><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Jan Ingvoldstad <frettled@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:10/06/2015 17:56 (GMT+00:00) </div><div>To: RIPE Address Policy WG <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> </div><div>Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published </div><div><br></div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Vladimir Andreev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vladimir@quick-soft.net" target="_blank">vladimir@quick-soft.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Hi!</div><div> </div><div>According to PDP it's possibly to change any proposal's state to "Discussion" or "Withdraw" after "Review" phase.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's true, but _right now_, he is too late.</div><div><br></div><div>If there is a new discussion phase, he can voice his opinions then.</div><div><br></div><div>It's also possible for him to launch his _own_ proposal.</div></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Jan</div> </div></div> </body>