<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/></head><body style="font-family:Geneva,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">Hello all,<br />
<br />
I don't support this proposal.<br />
<br />
This is Pandora's box. <br />
<br />
To get 1024 IPs for now company can register LIR and pay to RIPE 2000 eur + 1600 eur annually. If same company will transfer PI, then they will pay to RIPE only 50 eur.<br />
<br />
LIR's will be in much worse situation than owners of PI-networks.<br />
<br />
We can apply proposal if we will increase payment for PI-networks after transfer. For example, 1000 eur annually for each PI resource. In this situation new LIRs and owners of PI-network will pay into RIPE NCC similar payments.<br />
<br />
--<br />
Aleksei Ivanov<br />
LeaderTelecom<br />
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt" type="cite"><br />
On 28 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:<br />
<br />
> Dear AP WG,<br />
><br />
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:58:51AM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote:<br />
>> The draft document for the proposal described in 2014-02,<br />
>> "Allow IPv4 PI transfer" has been published. The impact analysis<br />
>> that was conducted for this proposal has also been published.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at:<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-02" target="_blank" title="https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-02">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-02</a><br />
>><br />
>> and the draft document at:<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-02/draft" target="_blank" title="https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-02/draft">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-02/draft</a><br />
><br />
><br />
> We could use a bit more input on this proposal. We have one clear<br />
> statement of support, and one mail that puts up some questions while not<br />
> taking a clear pro/con position - and that is not enough to declare<br />
> anything except "needs more time" at the end of review phase.<br />
><br />
> So, tell me your thoughts, please.<br />
><br />
> thanks,<br />
><br />
> Gert Doering,<br />
> APWG chair<br />
><br />
><br />
> Gert Doering<br />
> -- NetMaster<br />
> --<br />
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?<br />
><br />
> SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard<br />
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann<br />
> D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)<br />
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279<br />
</div></body></html>