<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/></head><body style="font-family:Geneva,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">Dear Daniel,<br />
<br />
<span style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family:monospace,fixed">> - It doesn't change</span><br />
<span style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family:monospace,fixed">> almost anything in practice - as new IPv4 PI aren't assigned, this</span><br />
<span style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family:monospace,fixed">> just affects existing assignments.</span><br />
<br />
It can drop amount of LIRs, while much cheaper to find PI - pay one time fee to owner and then return PA space and cancel contract as LIR. I understund difference PA & PI, but as I told - real customers often uses PI as PA.
<div>
<div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<div> </div>
<div>--</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>Aleksei<br />
LeaderTelecom</div>
</div>
<br />
04.08.2014 15:29 - Daniel Suchy написал(а):
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt" type="cite">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br />
Hash: SHA1<br />
<br />
Membership fee at these times doesn't in any case correlate with<br />
ammount of address resources held by each LIR. Conversely, fees were<br />
simplified.<br />
<br />
- From APWG perspective, I *support* this proposal. It doesn't change<br />
almost anything in practice - as new IPv4 PI aren't assigned, this<br />
just affects existing assignments.<br />
<br />
With regards,<br />
Daniel<br />
<br />
<br />
On 4.8.2014 11:46, Gert Doering wrote:<br />
> Hi,<br />
><br />
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:26:59AM +0200, Andrzej Dopiera??a<br />
> wrote:<br />
>> "the best" is simple structure. For example - every lir who give<br />
>> ip for others - pay 1600e, every pi owner who use ip for<br />
>> infrastructure pay 50e (like now) - every ip owner (independly pi<br />
>> or pa) pay the same amound of money for every ip which have<br />
><br />
> As said before, APWG has very little influence on the charging<br />
> scheme.<br />
><br />
> So please keep prices out of this discussion here - charging scheme<br />
> and RIPE fees can be discussed on the ripe-members list.<br />
><br />
> thanks,<br />
><br />
> Gert Doering -- APWG chair<br />
><br />
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br />
Version: GnuPG v1<br />
<br />
iEYEARECAAYFAlPfbGcACgkQ0m6yQqKjWoJoAgCfbkg+0rfky7vca9FMDNYzzp7e<br />
ZZ8An1UGqAFWdZqyNnatvYM+qa9TNHNp<br />
=yQF1<br />
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br />
</div></body></html>