Hi<div> </div><div>I personally believe it is not even fair to discuss policy in member mailing list--policy is made by and for the community, not only ripe members.</div><div> </div><div>So anything related to future policy change should stay in APWG. 在 2013年12月17日星期二，Gert Doering 写道： <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi, On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:09:09AM +0100, "Mag. Matthias ?ubik" wrote: [..] Please do *not* cross-post between the members-discuss and address-policy-wg mailing lists. Charging scheme discussions should stay in members-discuss, as APWG has no direct influence on the charging scheme. Policy change discussions are welcome in the address-policy-wg list, but should not cross-post to members-discuss, as that will fragment the discussion threads (some replies go to one of the lists, some go to the other, noise level goes up). Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 </blockquote></div> -- -- Kind regards. Lu This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this message and including the text of the transmission received.