<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>+1</div><div><br></div><div>I'm a little baffled as to why anyone would choose to hasten this at the cost of giving adequate notice? If we followed Randy's proposal to the letter we are still talking about being able to reuse AS# in roughly three months after policy is agreed. That seems fast enough to me, if not a little too fast :)</div><div><br></div><div>John <br><br>Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On Jun 26, 2013, at 3:07 AM, "Richard Hartmann" <<a href="mailto:richih.mailinglist@gmail.com">richih.mailinglist@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><p dir="ltr">On Jun 26, 2013 11:25 AM, "Wilfried Woeber" <<a href="mailto:Woeber@cc.univie.ac.at">Woeber@cc.univie.ac.at</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> In general I support the recycling of AS #s,<br>
> but for operational and consistency reasons I'd be a bit more careful...</p>
<p dir="ltr">There is no shortage of ASn so we have the luxury of being able to be _very_ careful.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Even after an ASn had been reclaimed we can easily wait a significant period of time before recycling them.<br></p>
<p dir="ltr">Richard</p>
</div></blockquote></body></html>