<html><body> <tt>> </tt> <tt>> Based on Randy's proposal:</tt> <tt>> </tt> <tt>> > inform owner of dangling reference. wait a week. inform again.</tt> <tt>> > wait a month. inform again. wait a week. remove dangling reference.</tt> <tt>> > wait a month to see if anything has broken enough to get the attention</tt> <tt>> > of folk who do not respond to email. reassign AS number.</tt> <tt>> </tt> <tt>> In my point of view, it is enough to inform once. Members have to > update their information, members have to be contactable by e-mail.</tt> <tt>> </tt> <tt>> So: </tt> <tt>> 1. Inform owner about its wrong objects (only once).</tt> <tt>> 2. If an owner doesn't clean up its objects, RIPE NCC should be able > to clean up by itself after a month.</tt> <tt>> 3. Re-assign AS numbers after two month.</tt> <tt>></tt> I agree vith Olaf : - inform once - clean up after a month - re-assign after two months. WBR, Dmitry Menzulskiy OJSC "VimpelCom" Moscwo, Russia</body></html>