<html> <head> <style></style></head> <body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'> Hi RIPE, Yes it does make sense that's why I vote in support of this proposal. Regards, Mehar Iftikhar Ahmad <div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div>> From: address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net > Subject: address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 16, Issue 16 > To: address-policy-wg@ripe.net > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:00:02 +0100 > > Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to > address-policy-wg@ripe.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > address-policy-wg-owner@ripe.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on > a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Emilio Madaio) > 2. Re: [policy-announce] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension > of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) > (Richard Hartmann) > 3. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6/32 to /29 > on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Jamie Stallwood) > 4. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 > on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Erik Bais) > 5. Re: [policy-announce] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension > of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) > (Julian Seifert) > 6. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 > on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (David Freedman) > 7. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 > on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (James Blessing) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:12:50 +0100 > From: "Emilio Madaio" <emadaio@ripe.net> > Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of > IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) > To: policy-announce@ripe.net > Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net > Message-ID: <E1TpcMU-0000QD-FA@puppy.ripe.net> > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation > and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 January 2013. > > Regards > > Emilio Madaio > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:22:43 +0100 > From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-10 New Policy > Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR > basis) > To: Address Policy Working Group <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> > Message-ID: > <CAD77+gSeLow2QyaVDNnCcBmmkxw2-CA9ebxac69TopbepLnCww@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Support. > > Anything else would be unfair and relatively easy to work around. > > > -- > Richard > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121231/0ff18fc5/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:24:26 -0000 > From: "Jamie Stallwood" <Jamie.Stallwood@imerja.com> > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal > (Extension of IPv6/32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) > To: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>, <policy-announce@ripe.net> > Message-ID: > <7B640CC73C18D94F83479A1D0B9A14040687E847@bhw-srv-dc1.imerja.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I support this proposal. > > Kind regards > Jamie Stallwood > > Jamie Stallwood > Security Specialist > Imerja Limited > > Tel: 0844 225 2888 > Mob: 07795 840385 > Jamie.Stallwood@imerja.com > > NIC Handle: uk.imerja.JS7259-RIPE > > > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net > [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Emilio Madaio > Sent: 31 December 2012 10:13 > To: policy-announce@ripe.net > Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net > Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of > IPv6/32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation > and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 January 2013. > > Regards > > Emilio Madaio > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > > > > -- > > Imerja Limited > Tel: 0870 8611488 | Fax: 0870 8611489 | 24x7 ISOC: 0870 8611490 | Web: www.imerja.com > > Registered Office: Paragon House, Paragon Business Park, Chorley New Road, Horwich, Bolton BL6 6HG > > Registered in England and Wales No. 5180119 > VAT Registered No. 845 0647 22 > ISO Registered Firm No. GB2001527 > > This email is confidential and intended solely for the person or > organisation to which it is addressed. It may contain privileged and > confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s) you > should not use, copy, distribute or take any action or reliance on it, > since to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have > received this transmission in error please notify the sender > immediately by email reply and delete it from your system. E-mail > messages are not secure and attachments could contain software viruses > which may damage your system. Whilst every reasonable precaution has > been taken to minimise this risk, Imerja Limited cannot accept any > liability for any damage sustained as a result of these factors. You > are advised to carry out your own virus checks before opening any > attachment. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are solely > those of the author and do not represent those of Imerja Limited > unless otherwise stated. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:36:02 +0000 > From: Erik Bais <erik@bais.name> > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal > (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) > To: "address-policy-wg@ripe.net" <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> > Message-ID: > <862A73D42343AE49B2FC3C32FDDFE91C09403FE8@e2010-mbx-c1n2.exchange2010.nl> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi, > > I support the policy proposal. > > And to all on the list, have a great 2013 !! > > Happy New Year. > > Regards, > Erik Bais > > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Emilio Madaio > Sent: maandag 31 december 2012 11:13 > To: policy-announce@ripe.net > Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net > Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 January 2013. > > Regards > > Emilio Madaio > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:47:16 +0000 > From: Julian Seifert <js@dacor.de> > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-10 New Policy > Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR > basis) > To: "address-policy-wg@ripe.net" <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>, > "policy-announce@ripe.net" <policy-announce@ripe.net> > Message-ID: > <71875FE4961EEE40BA4AACF7168091DE1CC378D3@exchange.suecdacor.local> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > > Support. > > Kind regards, > > Julian > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: policy-announce-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:policy-announce-bounces@ripe.net] Im Auftrag von Emilio Madaio > Gesendet: Montag, 31. Dezember 2012 11:13 > An: policy-announce@ripe.net > Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net > Betreff: [policy-announce] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 January 2013. > > Regards > > Emilio Madaio > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:52:44 +0000 > From: David Freedman <david.freedman@uk.clara.net> > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal > (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) > To: "address-policy-wg@ripe.net" <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> > Message-ID: > <E2B120470A420C49A1CB4F6D01C013F875B692FB@srvgrexmb02.claranet.local> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > support. > > dave. > > On 31/12/2012 10:12, "Emilio Madaio" <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote: > > > > >Dear Colleagues, > > > > > >A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation > >and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion. > > > > > >You can find the full proposal at: > > > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 > > > >We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > ><address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 January 2013. > > > >Regards > > > >Emilio Madaio > >Policy Development Officer > >RIPE NCC > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:56:15 +0000 > From: James Blessing <james.blessing@despres.co.uk> > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal > (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) > To: Address Policy Working Group <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> > Message-ID: > <CAL5RSTKeoH3=7fvQs9EosdH6QcA0k3MCdGfcVhCJ-3UA1mT-jQ@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Support > > J > > > On 31 December 2012 10:12, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote: > > > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > > > > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation > > and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion. > > > > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 > > > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > > <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 January 2013. > > > > Regards > > > > Emilio Madaio > > Policy Development Officer > > RIPE NCC > > > > -- > > > > James Blessing > > 07989 039 476 > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121231/9ce13062/attachment-0001.html > > End of address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 16, Issue 16 > ************************************************* </div> </div></body> </html>