<html><head/><body><html><head></head><body>I also support this proposal. It does not make sense otherwise.<br>
<br>
Safe migration everyone!<br>
Sascha<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><br>
<br>
Mike Simkins <mps31.ripe@gmail.com> schrieb:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif; margin-top: 0px">Support<br /><br /><br />On 31 Dec 2012, at 10:12, Emilio Madaio wrote:<br /><br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Dear Colleagues,<br /><br /><br />A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation<br />and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion.<br /><br /><br />You can find the full proposal at:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10</a><br /><br />We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to<br /><address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 January 2013.<br /><br />Regards<br /><br />Emilio Madaio<br />Policy Development Officer<br />RIPE NCC</blockquote><br /><br /><br /><br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html></body></html>