Hi Gert,<br><br>I fully aggree with your arguments this time.<br><br>Best,<br><br>Geza<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Gert Doering <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gert@space.net" target="_blank">gert@space.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:23:17AM +0200, Erik Bais wrote:<br>
> > You can find the full proposal at:<br>
> > <a href="https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-05" target="_blank">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-05</a><br>
> > Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to <a href="mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net">address-policy-wg@ripe.net</a> before 9 May 2012.<br>
><br>
> I have 1 question before the last-call ends tomorrow. . .<br>
><br>
> In the grand scheme of things and also seeing the other policies popping up for trying to divide whatever is going to be left from the final /8.<br>
><br>
> If we all think that this reservation is a good thing for the good of the internet ... (And I agree on the reasoning) is reserving only a /16 from the final /8 enough?<br>
><br>
> 65k /24's are in the last /8 ... and for future IXP's we 'only' reserve a /16 (256 /24's )<br>
><br>
> I would rather see that increased to a /14 if possible.<br>
<br>
</div></div>Formally, we can't change anything "just so" at this point in the PDP - so<br>
we'd have to go back to review phase, draft a new policy text, and then<br>
re-do review phase and last call.<br>
<br>
If you think this is important enough, please formally voice "strong and<br>
sustained opposition" - which is what it takes to bounce the proposal<br>
back to review phase.<br>
<br>
OTOH, since this came from the EIX WG, I think they have a pretty good<br>
idea on the number of IXPs to be expected world-wide, and how much growth<br>
to expect there over the next 5-10 years. Since they seem to be happy<br>
with the proposal as it stands, with a /16, and the constraints that this<br>
brings with it (= 256 new small IXPs, or 128 new IXPs with a /23, etc.),<br>
I would prefer to accept their assumptions and go forward.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Gert Doering<br>
-- APWG chair<br>
--<br>
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?<br>
<br>
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard<br>
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann<br>
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)<br>
Tel: <a href="tel:%2B49%20%2889%29%2032356-444" value="+498932356444">+49 (89) 32356-444</a> USt-IdNr.: DE813185279<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br>