<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 16:20, Nick Hilliard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nick@inex.ie">nick@inex.ie</a>></span> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Regardless of the history of the previous proposal, history will not look<br>
back kindly if we collectively flail our arms in the air and claim "it<br>
would never work, so there's no point in even trying". Call this naivety,<br>
idealism, or stupidity - I don't really care. The policy has merit and<br>
refusing to deal with it now (while we're still vaguely sanguine about IPv4<br>
address allocation) will merely create a much more troublesome environment<br>
for attempting to get any sort of global agreement of any sort in the<br>
future (when no-one will be even remotely happy about allocation policy).<br></blockquote><div><br>I completely agree. You have, in fact, written a fairly accurate description of why I am putting my time and effort into this policy. Now is the time to act - we can neither live in the past nor expect the future to take care of itself.<br>
<br>~Chris<br>
(again speaking entirely on my own)<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<font color="#888888"><br>
Nick<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div>