<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'>"Nothing is so <B>permanent as a temporary</B> government program." -- Dr. Milton Friedman<BR>
<BR>
If we decide to hand out /24s to 6RD and we think that’s not a waste of address space (even though nobody has been able to give me an satisfactory answer I’m willing to throw in the towel) make that a permanent allocation, not a temporary one. The pretense that people will actually hand back that prefix is, let’s say, not consistent with current experiences in IPv4. Once it’s out of the bag it’s out of the bag, never to return.<BR>
<BR>
Remco<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
On 01-12-09 12:10, "Mikael Abrahamsson" <<a href="swmike@swm.pp.se">swmike@swm.pp.se</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, <a href="michael.dillon@bt.com">michael.dillon@bt.com</a> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
> regardless of whether or not it is in RIPE policy, the /56<BR>
> for private residences is still good practice and is being<BR>
> tracked by vendors.<BR>
<BR>
Just for the record, I've reconsidered and now agree with Michael that we<BR>
should hand out /24 to ISPs who want to run 6RD, to facilitate /56<BR>
handouts to end customers.<BR>
<BR>
I would want a discussion on this being 6RD exclusive use and a 5 year<BR>
temporary handout with option for 5 year extension per time until the<BR>
community deems that 6RD is depreciated and this space should no longer be<BR>
used for that.<BR>
<BR>
Should we reserve a /8 for 6RD use, approximately one per ASN? Should we<BR>
just say that a certain /8 is for 6RD use and it's not even handled by<BR>
RIRs but instead handled like GLOP space for multicast, ie that it's just<BR>
the ASN mapped into this space? Do we need a /6 to handle future 32bit ASN<BR>
increase in the next 10 years?<BR>
<BR>
Perhaps there should be this kind of IPv4-mapped-into-IPv6-per-ASN space<BR>
available for general use, not being 6RD exclusive?<BR>
<BR>
I do think this should be temporary though, with the aim at this being<BR>
deprecated in 5-10 years.<BR>
<BR>
--<BR>
Mikael Abrahamsson email: <a href="swmike@swm.pp.se">swmike@swm.pp.se</a><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<br><br>
<P class=MsoPlainText style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify"><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; COLOR: #898c8b; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">17 Thomas More Street</st1:address></st1:Street>, <st1:address w:st="on"><st1:Street w:st="on">Thomas More Square</st1:Street>, <st1:City w:st="on">London</st1:City> <st1:PostalCode w:st="on">E1W 1YW</st1:PostalCode></st1:address>. Registered in <st1:country-region w:st="on">England</st1:country-region> and <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Wales</st1:place></st1:country-region> No. 6293383.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
</body>
</HTML>